Canon VS Nikon: Which Is Better???

Canon Would Like to Wish All You Pro Photographers a Big "F" You!

Wow!  It looks like Canon is now in the business of setting up low-cost photo studios to under-cut professional photographers.

Not sure if this is the first, but the one in Calgary featured in the image above offers a portrait studio and print service with prices so ridiculously low that it even undercuts WALMART!

I'm totally flabbergasted!  Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

Canon EOS 5D MkII - New Firmware Adds Features For Filmmakers To The 5D MkII

Magic Lantern has released new firmware for the Canon EOS 5D MkII that adds features especially for Filmmakers!

The new 5D MkII firmware is essentially an extension for the video mode of the 5D MkII that enables capabilities specifically designed for filmmakers.

Most 5D MkII shooters have found out by now that the 5D MkII makes a great movie, but the audio leaves something to be desired. This new firmware is aimed at fixing that. It adds "on-screen stereo audio meters, live audio monitoring, reduced audio noise, and crop marks for different formats."

Magic Lantern has posted a great video on their new 5D Mark II firmware that goes through all the new features and shows them in use. There's also a video that does a great evaluation of the new Magic Lantern 5D MkII firmware's audio vs the stock 5D MkII firmware's audio.

The new 5D MkII firmware is open platform, and the developer says there'll be new features added that will "make the camera even more useful on set." It's nice to see open platform firmware and software as it leaves things open for others to contribute and build upon!

There's even a Magic Lantern 5D MkII firmware wiki so you can get all the reference info you need in one place.

24P isn't currently available in the new 5D MkII firmware, although the author is working on it. He states in the 5D MkII firmware wiki that "it may be possible to select different frame rates, and if someone is able to find the register inside the DIGIC4 to set the frame rate, we can easily toggle it in Magic Lantern. Without any documentation, however, our best hope might be that Canon will add these two frame rates to compete with the new DSLR cameras from its competitors. "

If any of you techno programmer gurus out there can help out, I'm sure your efforts would be appreciated!

Overall, the new Magic Lantern 5D MkII firmware looks to be a great option for those fusion shooters who want to make movies with their 5D MkII!

Having focus problems with your 5D MkII? You're not alone!
Canon EOS 5D MkII Autofocus: Unhappy 5D MkII Users Speak Out

Canon EOS 5D MkII Autofocus - Unhappy 5D MkII Users Speak Out

It's no secret that Canon has autofocus problems with it's DSLR digital cameras. Whether it's persistent soft focus, out of focus, or back focus, Canon can't seem to get it's autofocus system to work properly in its DSLR lineup.

We all heard about the Canon 1D MkIII autofocus problems. Rob Galbraith blew the lid off that one, and try as they did, Canon couldn't keep denying that the 1D MkIII had autofocus problems when more and more people were able to replicate Rob's findings.

When the Canon 5D MkII came out, a lot of people were singing it's praises from the get go, but there was another chorus that could be heard singing in the background, and the song was all about 5D MkII autofocus problems, questions, issues, and complaints. Those talking about the problems they were having with the 5D MkII autofocus were initially drowned out by the initial 5D MkII praisers and ravers, a lot of which were a direct result of a great marketing campaign and publicity push by Canon, but the tide is turning and the voice of those having issues with their 5D MkII autofocus is starting to drown out the praisers and ravers.

Peter Gregg, inventor of A Better Bounce Card (my favorite flash modifier), was one of the first to write about the 5D MkII autofocus. In his latest article, Can the coming Canon 1D Mark IV win back those who switched to Nikon?, Peter makes a pointed request of Canon. "I say this respectfully, but I want a focus system that works. No more sloppy soft images." Many a Canon shooter nodded their head respectfully when they read that line in Peter's article, some shed a tear, and others felt the resentment and anger begin to rise again as they thought about all the issues they've been having with their $3,000 5D MkII that can't focus properly.

The Fake Chuck Westfall brought up the 5D MkII autofocus problems in his post, F@#$ed, for the foreseeable Future, and many 5D MkII shooters wrote in to comment. Some were relieved to find out they weren't alone in experiencing autofocus problems with their 5D MkII, and some were glad to realize it wasn't anything they were doing... just a problem with the camera. All could agree that a $3000 5D MkII that couldn't focus properly was unacceptable, and Canon should do something to rectify the situation.

While I haven't had the misfortune of owning a 5D MkII, I have owned and shot the original Canon 5D, the 40D, 30D, 20D, and Digital Rebel XTi. While I did get some fantastic shots with each of my Canon DSLRs, I also got a lot of out of focus and soft shots with each one. I shot a lot more photos when I shot Canon DSLRs because I could never be sure if the focus would be good. Now that I'm back to shooting Nikon, I shoot a lot less photos because I'm not having focus issues anymore.

Don't get me wrong, I liked my Canon DSLRs, but once Nikon came out with it's newer generation of DSLRs (D300, D3, D3X, D700, and soon to be D700X), the balance swung in Nikon's favor. The big advantage with Canon had always been it's high ISO quality. When Nikon released its newer generation of DSLRs, Canon's high ISO advantage disappeared. Nikon took the high ISO crown with the D3 and D700, and all of Nikon's DSLR lineup focuses MUCH better than the Canon DSLR lineup.

When the 5D MkII came out, I considered buying one. It had a lot of things going for it, and I was intrigued. I was also wary though, as my past Canon experience had left me once bitten, twice shy, which, as it turns out, was a good thing. The 5D MkII has the usual Canon autofocus problems as many 5D MkII owners have found out. No matter what else a camera has going for it, if it doesn't focus well, I don't want it. You can have all the megapixels in the world, and they don't mean a thing if your photos are out of focus.

Come on Canon! I can't believe you aren't capable of making a DSLR that focuses as good as the Nikon D3, D3X, D700, or my D300. In fact, I don't see why you can't leapfrog Nikon and come out with an even better autofocus system than the Nikons have. In the immortal words of Peter Gregg, "I say this respectfully, but I want a focus system that works. No more sloppy soft images." And while you're at it, how about fixing your quality control problems too!

Feel free to leave a comment if you've had problems with your 5D MkII or any other Canon DSLR for that matter. If we make our voices heard, Canon will have to start listening!

**Update: Canon EOS 7D - Will We Be Seeing a Canon 7D in September? and Why Most Of The Canon 7D Specs Are Wrong**

Have you had problems with your Canon DSLR?

Canon is known for many things, but Quality Control isn't one of them.

One of the best things about going back to Nikon was knowing the quality control was in an entirely different league than Canon's.

Those of you that have owned several Canon DSLR bodies probably know what I'm talking about. Some don't like to admit it, but most pro's who shoot Canon have had issues with quality control.

I know of some people whose Canon experiences read like a REALLY bad Jerry Springer episode (i.e. totally unbelievable).

One of the worst cases (but by no means an isolated case) is that of Neil van Niekerk, professional photographer, lighting guru, and author of the popular photography blog, www.planetneil.com.

Neil chronicles his crazy Canon experiences in a reply comment (Neil Said, April 28, 2009 11:19pm) about halfway through the comments section of his post, The Best Camera In The World.

Check out the pic of the table covered in receipts and paperwork for the HUGE list of Canon repairs he's had to have done.

Is Google Your Business Partner? GOOGLE BUSINESS MARKETING

Switching from Canon to Nikon

There has been a lot of talk on the internet from folks considering the switch from Canon to Nikon. Some of them are ex-Nikon shooters looking to come home, and some are Canon shooters intrigued by everything the new Nikon D3 has to offer.

Considering I used to shoot Nikon (switched to Canon in the Spring of 2006), obviously these new Nikons hold an appeal for me. I like my Canon's, and although I've never had any problems with them (touch wood), I don't have the same confidence in Canon QC and reliability as I did with my Nikons.

Case in point: the 30D vs the D200. Image quality aside, when you pick them both up, the 30D feels like a toy in comparison. The D200 is much better built and is much better stacked feature and ergonomic-wise.

That said, there is something missing in Nikon's lens line-up that may stop me from buying a D3 or a D300 (I wouldn’t switch back, but would shoot “bi” if I bought a new Nikon). They have no standard zoom with VR. Big problem! I was really surprised when they announced the 24-70 with no VR. What were they thinking? This would've been a huge thing for Canon and Nikon shooters alike.

Image stabilization (or VR or OS or whatever you want to call it) is something that should be pretty standard now. I like the idea of a body based system like the Pentax K10D or the new Sony A700, but so far these haven't panned out. The K10D doesn't even have pro lenses available yet, and the AF speed is an issue (maybe not once we can get a hold of the new Pentax lenses). The Sony A700 looks good on paper, but it's IS better be better than it's A100 little brother because the A100 wasn't all that. Also, A700 images I’ve seen so far look pretty bad at high ISO.

Then there’s the price. While this isn’t a consideration for some, it is for me. I like to get maximum value and a great bargain. As much as the D3 appeals to me on many levels, it's price tag does not. The D300 is more my speed. I'm not saying the D3's price isn't justified, just that it doesn't fit into my business model. So, the big question is how the D300 will do on image quality.

And of course, Nikon has yet to introduce a standard zoom with VR. Will they? This is something many will want to think about before considering a switch. With Canon you’ve got the Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS and the Canon 24-105 f4L IS to choose from. With Nikon, you’ve got nothing in a PRO caliber.

And what if Pentax brings out a successor to the K10D that uses the new 12MP CMOS sensor that the D300 and A700 use? The K10D is one FULLY FEATURED camera! If the new lenses deliver good AF speed, I think I'll be adding a Pentax... not a Nikon.

Ahhh... so much to consider!